|
|
Post by sarahrose on Dec 7, 2008 21:38:28 GMT
I've got an interview with Caleb (Triple J with Zan?) downloaded on my computer and in it he mentions how one song on Only By The Night was actually first intended for Aha Shake Heartbreak. Anyone know what song he's talking about? edited to include actual interview (i know i always like to see/hear things first hand, first attempt with sendspace) www.sendspace.com/file/v6w0pelet me know if it doesn't work. |
|
|
|
Post by Savanna on Dec 7, 2008 21:39:50 GMT
Hmm...interesting...
anyone know? i mean, it could be almost any of them..
|
|
|
|
Post by whiskers on Dec 7, 2008 21:45:26 GMT
i was wondering the same thing when sex on fire was first aired and someone on here told me they'd read in an interview it was 17.
|
|
|
|
Post by sarahrose on Dec 7, 2008 21:47:29 GMT
i was wondering the same thing when sex on fire was first aired and someone on here told me they'd read in an interview it was 17. huh, what about 17? i'm confused. |
|
|
|
Post by Savanna on Dec 7, 2008 21:56:29 GMT
i was gonna say 17!!
the lyrics just seem....ASH-esque
|
|
|
|
Post by sarahrose on Dec 7, 2008 21:58:09 GMT
I think someone read an interview that said 17 was intended to go on ASH... is that right? ahh i see. the bells in that song really irk me. wasn't it matthew who wanted to get bells in the album somehwere?, damn you matthew. |
|
|
|
Post by xlouisex on Dec 7, 2008 21:58:33 GMT
Yeah ive read a couple of times 17 was meant to be on aha shake. ^
|
|
|
|
Post by Meh on Dec 7, 2008 21:58:54 GMT
17 seems the most likely...although I can't even imagine it being on ASH. I'm not sure I want to  |
|
|
|
Post by xlouisex on Dec 7, 2008 22:01:00 GMT
^yeah if it was meant to be.. im glad it wasnt!
|
|
|
|
Post by Meh on Dec 7, 2008 22:03:20 GMT
It shouldn't even be on OBTN in my opinion...sorry if I offend anyone saying that. It just doesn't fit!!
|
|
sxesadie
Runnin' Free
Such a Charmer
Posts: 275
|
Post by sxesadie on Dec 7, 2008 22:09:27 GMT
ahh i see. the bells in that song really irk me. wasn't it matthew who wanted to get bells in the album somehwere?, damn you matthew. I think 17 would be a decent song if it wasn't for those shitty bells!! It makes the whole thing terrible imo. I'm glad they didn't put it on Aha, it would have taken away from how perfect Aha is. |
|
|
|
Post by Meh on Dec 7, 2008 22:09:50 GMT
^Thats true, the approach would have been different. Don't get me started on the bells. I cringe everytime!
|
|
|
|
Post by Savanna on Dec 7, 2008 22:11:27 GMT
I know, it makes me feel like I'm about to hear a Christmas jingle
|
|
|
|
Post by Meh on Dec 7, 2008 22:12:44 GMT
^ If they went into a rendition of Santa Claus is coming to town it'd probably be better!
|
|
|
|
Post by sarahrose on Dec 7, 2008 22:13:35 GMT
he's (matthew's) prolly getting shit for it.
i must find the interview where i read/heard about the bells.
|
|
|
|
Post by Savanna on Dec 7, 2008 22:14:56 GMT
Aw, poor Matthew! Never says anything and the one time he pipes up and suggests something, it doesn't turn out well!
|
|
alexcolaco
Runnin' Free
The Sleazy Riders
Posts: 241
|
Post by alexcolaco on Dec 7, 2008 22:15:56 GMT
i read or saw something about that. i think it was 17 or revelry but who knows. it could have anyone or no one at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Meh on Dec 7, 2008 22:16:21 GMT
Did Matt suggest the bells?!
|
|
|
|
Post by Savanna on Dec 7, 2008 22:17:36 GMT
^^ yes !
|
|
|
|
Post by Meh on Dec 7, 2008 22:19:35 GMT
Aww well I'll let him off...its his first mistake. Any more though.....  We do learn from them! |
|
The perfect manwhich
Mustache rides for free!
