|
|
Post by crumpet on Mar 21, 2007 22:38:50 GMT
|
|
fuzz
Innocent Smile
Posts: 128 
|
Post by fuzz on Mar 21, 2007 23:59:39 GMT
WHY THE FUCK HASNT MINE COME YET!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Lihllvmch on Mar 22, 2007 0:01:39 GMT
thanks for posting it crumpet  |
|
|
|
Post by Viscera Eyes on Mar 22, 2007 0:44:30 GMT
I really enjoyed reading that interview!
Karma!
|
|
|
|
Post by nadius on Mar 22, 2007 1:45:05 GMT
Me too, thanks for posting!!! Karma  |
|
|
|
Post by codyfollowill on Mar 22, 2007 1:45:26 GMT
did they rate BOTT?
If so, what did they give it?
|
|
|
|
Post by crumpet on Mar 22, 2007 2:00:13 GMT
i couldnt find one in there.
|
|
|
|
Post by codyfollowill on Mar 22, 2007 2:09:18 GMT
darnnnnnn.
I was excited for mine JUST FOR A REVIEW.
but an arcticle is good too.....
|
|
|
|
Post by AccuratePassion on Mar 22, 2007 7:27:31 GMT
I am sure the rating will be in the late march one... So the next one I assume. I need to pick this up. Gosh, buying a magazine with Panic! At the Disco is not gonna look good for me...
|
|
|
|
Post by roknrol on Mar 22, 2007 9:05:56 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by evilincarnate on Mar 22, 2007 9:33:23 GMT
Yeah...I got the P!ATD one a good month ago, and I didn't see anything about KOL in it...god forbid they would have P!ATD on the cover twice in one year?!?!?! The latest issue I've gotten had South Park on the cover and was dated 3/22/07...and there was no KOL in that either.
Hmm...I'll just have to wait for the next one to come and see.
But as far as reviews go, Rolling Stone usually runs them the same week the albums are released, so I'd give it another week yet. But when that time comes I'd expect them to get the front page of the review section, as RS tends to like them a lot. (So expect a few good pictures and one of those great illustrations).
|
|
|
|
Post by roknrol on Mar 22, 2007 10:29:44 GMT
But as far as reviews go, Rolling Stone usually runs them the same week the albums are released, so I'd give it another week yet. But when that time comes I'd expect them to get the front page of the review section, as RS tends to like them a lot. (So expect a few good pictures and one of those great illustrations). I'm sorry if this is an absolute stupid question, but does Rolling Stone appear weekly or monthly then? 'cause I always thought monthly.. but here in Holland it's not such a popular magazine, so that's why I don't know |
|
|
|
Post by roknrol on Mar 22, 2007 10:37:04 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by roknrol on Mar 22, 2007 10:44:35 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by crumpet on Mar 22, 2007 11:40:15 GMT
Yeah, it is the Australian/nz April issue. There was a full page photo as well but I didnt bother to scan it because the photos from that shoot are already on here  |
|
|
|
Post by evilincarnate on Mar 22, 2007 12:46:51 GMT
Yeah, it is the Australian/nz April issue. There was a full page photo as well but I didnt bother to scan it because the photos from that shoot are already on here Oh, I had an inkling this might have been the case. It's cool none the less, and I'm sure they will make it into the US version within the next few weeks anyway. Thanks for sharing! |
|
|
|
Post by csolis on Mar 22, 2007 16:18:19 GMT
wait im confused now, is this article on the issue with Panic!?!?!?! cause i have that one and the one with South Park on the cover, and i didnt see either the article or the review on it, and believe me i checked!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by evilincarnate on Mar 22, 2007 16:50:00 GMT
wait im confused now, is this article on the issue with Panic!?!?!?! cause i have that one and the one with South Park on the cover, and i didnt see either the article or the review on it, and believe me i checked!!! No, this article was from the Australian version of Rolling Stone, so it won't be in any of those issues. |
|
|
|
Post by untutoredyouth on Mar 22, 2007 17:04:21 GMT
www.rollingstone.com/artists/kingsofleon/albums/album/13885771/review/13891139/because_of_the_timesWhat the fuck... "When the Kings first arrived on the garage-rock scene a few years ago, they whipped up so much interest right away, nobody really minded that they weren't any good. Their Grizzly Adams beards, their Bible-thumping family background -- it all fed into their fans' Huck Finn fantasy of unspoiled backwoods boogie. Well, the back story was cute for about five minutes, but the songs didn't get the job started until their second album, the stunning (and sorely underrated) Aha Shake Heartbreak." Does anyone else think this is absolute bullshit? Basically saying that YAYM is shit. And also saying the only reason we liked KoL in the beginning was for aesthetic reasons, 'Their Grizzly Adams beards, their Bible-thumping family background -- it all fed into their fans' Huck Finn fantasy of unspoiled backwoods boogie.' And also to say that BOTT is better than YAYM and ASH, is a terrible misjudegement. Cheers Rob Sheffield
|
|
lu
Runnin' Free
Posts: 233
|
Post by lu on Mar 22, 2007 18:24:13 GMT
www.rollingstone.com/artists/kingsofleon/albums/album/13885771/review/13891139/because_of_the_timesWhat the fuck... "When the Kings first arrived on the garage-rock scene a few years ago, they whipped up so much interest right away, nobody really minded that they weren't any good. Their Grizzly Adams beards, their Bible-thumping family background -- it all fed into their fans' Huck Finn fantasy of unspoiled backwoods boogie. Well, the back story was cute for about five minutes, but the songs didn't get the job started until their second album, the stunning (and sorely underrated) Aha Shake Heartbreak." Does anyone else think this is absolute bullshit? I do! |
|
