|
|
Post by cocochoco on Jul 9, 2005 9:59:06 GMT
the pics are awesome! thanks so much for posting!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by csolis on Jul 9, 2005 10:02:30 GMT
can i just say that Matt looks SUPER HOT!!!!!!this boy is getting hotter by the minute!!!!!! is it wrong of me to say that im not liking Caleb as much and trading him in for Matt?  |
|
|
|
Post by daisy on Jul 9, 2005 10:23:13 GMT
oh man! those pics. FUCK! *thud* who's on the cover of this gq mag? uk or us version? HELP! charlotte church  .....uk edition. yeah, that risen thing makes sense :)xx |
|
|
|
Post by apple on Jul 9, 2005 11:18:14 GMT
ive never heard of GQ mag befour !
what type of mag is it?
|
|
|
|
Post by compton on Jul 9, 2005 14:43:06 GMT
Oh god. Cream. Those are soo hott.
|
|
|
|
Post by ohhi on Jul 9, 2005 16:56:13 GMT
can i just say that Matt looks SUPER HOT!!!!!!this boy is getting hotter by the minute!!!!!! is it wrong of me to say that im not liking Caleb as much and trading him in for Matt? YES! it is. matt's totally mine, missus  they're good pictures but they seem to styled and fake and whatnot. but matty is really hot. |
|
|
|
Post by daisy on Jul 9, 2005 17:46:03 GMT
apple, you've never heard of GQ?! it's a mens fashion/style/music/sex......magazine i bought it today! the pics are fab, but i don't really like the interview too much talk of money and groupies ::)xx |
|
|
|
Post by apple on Jul 9, 2005 20:25:39 GMT
i seen it down the shop but it looked a bit ...well.....dirty so i didnt get it |
|
|
|
Post by daisy on Jul 9, 2005 21:37:47 GMT
haha, yeah, it is a bit dirty :Pxx
|
|
|
|
Post by mickey o'neil on Jul 9, 2005 21:55:31 GMT
gentleman's quarterly can be a bit un-gentlemanly sometimes. i'm still a faithful subscriber though. that article was really crap, i thought.
|
|
|
|
Post by daisy on Jul 9, 2005 22:02:07 GMT
yeah, i didn't really like it.
too much negative talk about money and groupies (if you get what i mean?).xx
|
|
|
|
Post by mickey o'neil on Jul 9, 2005 23:40:21 GMT
exactly why i didnt like it. funny how people still talk about their background story.
|
|
|
|
Post by caroline, maybe on Jul 10, 2005 0:20:47 GMT
yeah seriously, if they want to hear a story about a preachers family so bad, why don't they just go to a church? that's not why kol are famous. it's just getting really old.
|
|
|
|
Post by mickey o'neil on Jul 10, 2005 0:28:22 GMT
getting old indeed. i guess a lot of people still dont know who they are so its kind of intersting for them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Clair on Jul 10, 2005 15:43:24 GMT
or the interviewer just couldnt be bothered to do his job.
|
|
|
|
Post by caroline, maybe on Jul 10, 2005 21:09:24 GMT
or the interviewer just couldnt be bothered to do his job. hahaha. |
|
|
|
Post by cornflake on Jul 11, 2005 6:35:01 GMT
What month is the GQ article from? June or July? And is it from the American or the British GQ?
|
|
|
|
Post by mickey o'neil on Jul 11, 2005 6:36:50 GMT
british, dont know the month, i would think july
|
|
|
|
Post by cornflake on Jul 11, 2005 6:37:50 GMT
british, dont know the month, i would think july Oh crap...ok..never mind the month. It says on the bottom where the page number is. Silly me. Thanks Andy! I'll check out the british version |
|
|
|
Post by ILoveTheRazzleKid on Jul 11, 2005 11:36:29 GMT
mm didn't like the interview too much as it portrayed the kings to be all about 'beautiful women and money' kind of thing... anyone else get that vibe? Loving the pictures though miiiiaow groovalicious.
|
|
