Tut.

[gypster]

chipsilver said:

Who is this guy?

a knob

[whatever]

Lol, you actually had to edit those two words? What a moron.

[vintagechic1251]

whatever said:

Lol, you actually had to edit those two words? What a moron.

The only one I'm calling a "moron" is you! That's a little childish, don't you think? I mean, you're a serious professional, I'm sure.

Oh, do you know something else I love? Dogs! I love dogs, they're fluffy and cute. And if you have a certain kind, people can steal your dog. They come in all sorts of breeds and your just better off having the latest trend of breed or else.

You see, I'm a pro at dogs, you're a pro at computers. we're even.

[gypster]

whatever said:

Lol, you actually had to edit those two words? What a moron.

well at first a put a huge knob, but then I thought that's probably not true

[whatever]

Saying a dog is fluffy and cute makes you a pro? Thats like saying a computer is big and metal. Anyway I wasn't actually referring to you, and also yes it was childish - your point? I like to mix it up a little, relax man. Besides it's my holidays, I don't even need to play the serious professional - like I would at my job anyway..? You gotta stop trying to figure me out.

Fair enough gypster, I'll pretend there was no hidden context behind that.

[chipsilver]

well, ive been coming to this board for quite a while, and not with the intention of bringing anyone down. In fact, you're the first person in anout 2 years that Ive really disliked.

As for your being confident about who you are, Id guess its a false confidence. You talk about yourself far too much for that to be really be true.

"The superior man is modest in his speech, but exceeds in his actions."

Confucius, The Confucian Analects

[whatever]

*Yawn* You really are a self righteous dickhead. Get over yourself; I don't have time for idiots like you.

[chipsilver]

Well, thats cool - dont respond to me then. You never actually say anything other than childish denials and put downs anyway.

Im sure youre time is much better spent teaching us all how to program and change our registry. Busy, busy, important guy.

[whatever]

Oh so you're indenial too; interesting. As for being childish, I'm actually taking the piss out of you. Sorry you don't have the capacity to comprehend that. As for me 'teaching' - I have only responded to other people's threads with advice. This thread was dedicated to the design of the site - a fucking straight forward question which has been totally blown out of proportion; especially by the likes of you. So maybe you should back off and give a little bit of STFU. Nice to see you only seem to ever come online and start posting on these 3 topics. Go figure.

Also, as for the 'put downs' - You should surely be able to work out that you're clearly trying to play a position above me. I hate arrogant asshats like you.

[chipsilver]

whatever said:

Oh so you're indenial too; interesting.

I can just imagine you stroking your beard sagely.. Well, could you explain how you've managed to work that out, please - if you have the time, of course?

At the moment, i dont have a great deal of time for the internet. Usually I post in the randomness forum with the friendly, amusing people. Its just that at the moment, you're the funniest thing on here, and you dont even know it.

Oh, and by the way - since I left primary school, it became a little trickier to take the piss out of me than simply calling me "wise-ass" and "retard". Try using this intellect you hold in such high regard...

[AccuratePassion]

whatever- it seems like you are here to cause trouble. You keep mentioning how you can do all thing funky computer stuff but that it wouldn't be hacking because it's based off perception and because "technically" it isn't hacking or some shit. What attracted you to these boards? Why are you here? You haven't contibuted a single bit of intelligent conversation since you got here. What is your purpose?

[cornflake]

The source looks pretty basic. It obviously is provided by Proboards. The creators of this site did not intended to develop their own message board by writing their own coding. They are simply utilizing a free and time saving method of obtaining a message board that is already coded. Simple things, such as the visual display of the board, can be altered by them.

Are you a little cracker? Ah...we have a little cracker in our midst. (*coos at cracker*)

[whatever]

Hm. In my opinion the way the java is scripted to forward the login page looks a bit weird and buggy. I know the webhost of this site can't edit the source. Cracker?

And to be honest razor, I'm just going to ignore you.

[cornflake]

You are truly not aware of the term cracker? Are you a wannbe hacker, or are you simply just somewhat knowledgable in scripting and are genuinly trying to help?

It just sounded like you had an inflated sence of self though varrious posts in this thread so I was wondering what you true intention was. To help or to gloat?

What specific component of the scripting looks odd? Grab a segment.

[whatever]

Oh so you were actually calling me a cracker? Um ok... Yes I know what one is, wasn't sure that was what you meant or not though. Anyway, no I am not gloating, or threatening. To be perfectly honest, if I ever got caught in cyber crime, I'd be out of a job in computers for the rest of my life - so I doubt I'm going to be that dumb.

In the source on the login page, you will notice "index.cgi" - scan it (there's about 60 CGI scripting errors found). Now look at the java further down. You can exploit the CGI scripting, then change the java script to gain access. Not sure exactly how far you could go, but nevermind.

[cornflake]

whatever said:

Oh so you were actually calling me a cracker? Um ok... Yes I know what one is, wasn't sure that was what you meant or not though. Anyway, no I am not gloating, or threatening. To be perfectly honest, if I ever got caught in cyber crime, I'd be out of a job in computers for the rest of my life - so I doubt I'm going to be that dumb.

In the source on the login page, you will notice "index.cgi" - scan it (there's about 60 CGI scripting errors found). Now look at the java further down. You can exploit the CGI scripting, then change the java script to gain access. Not sure exactly how far you could go, but nevermind.

What program do you use to find the scripting errors? Checking to see if I have the same one.

[apple]

*gives everyone cookies* calm down man!

[whatever]

I'm using a non-commercial one. You could try numerous scanners like VoidEye, Simpsons, Shadow, Retina, Legion etc. There's heaps of CGI vulnerability scanners out there. I'm pretty sure they will all pick up the same bugs.

[apple]

hey whatever !

how come you dont have a avatar??

[whatever]

Basically, I've not tried, and I don't really intend to - but it looks like you could do something like fooling the coding into allowing you access to "cgi-bin/test-cgi?/*". That should display a list of the root servers; as this forum is hosted on apache. You could even attempt it through telnet using "GET /cgi-bin/test-cgi?x> /*". Anyway enough of that, wouldn't want to give people the wrong idea would I